Apr 09, 2022
In General Discussion
Wiki End-users are still used to Phone Number Database a limited extent in political decision-making When it comes to political decision-making, the end user (citizens) is only used to a limited extent in Phone Number Database generating content (policy). Admittedly, a lot is happening in the field of democratic progress, such as the G1000 meetings (crowdsourcing), the referendum Phone Number Database on the association agreement with Ukraine by GeenPeil (crowdsourcing), the Democratic Challenge (co-creation) and various citizens' initiatives, such as The Singel Park in Leiden (co-creation. But in most cases it concerns Phone Number Database a one-off intervention, or a contribution to the end of the chain. In terms of innovation, you could speak of incremental, rather than disruptive, innovations. Why don't we Phone Number Database use people's collective knowledge to actually write policy together, just like with Wikipedia? Why don't we use people's collective Phone Number Database knowledge to actually write policy together, just like with Wikipedia? Public and transparent. No complicated jargon, but Phone Number Database clear and accessible. A big difference with other applications is that in politics it is ultimately not about the truth, but about needs. And these are personal. Not co-authoring means accepting the policy. Extremes will level out and the policy will eventually represent an accurate reflection of society. It will of course take some time and Phone Number Database practice will show, but I argue in favor of an experiment. 3. Being able to finance yourself: cutting out the middleman When we talk about disruptive innovations , we cannot leave Uber and Airbnb untouched.